“Bartleby, the
Scrivener: A Story of Wall-Street" by Herman Melville depicts characters
whose personalities reflect the evolving world of industrialization. “Bartleby”
deals with several characters whose attitudes at work, suggest more about the
environment than is explicitly told throughout the story. The subtitle, “A
Story of Wall-Street,” of Melville’s story suggests one of two things: it is
coincidental, or Melville believed there were issues big enough to write about
in the economic and social aspects of the industrial revolution. At the very beginning of the story we meet
the lawyer-narrator who insists on telling the story of Bartleby, “who[m] was a
scrivener the strangest [he] ever saw or heard of” (Melville 18). Melville is
suggesting that strange things are happening to both the economic and social
environment. People like Bartleby are becoming static beings due to uninteresting daily
routines at the law office. In fact, Bartleby refuses to do his job as the days
go by. Bartleby’s answer to any work suggestions made to him was, “I would
prefer not to.” With the progression of the industrial world outside the law
office, there was a great demand for copyists and/or scriveners to rewrite the
words of another being, over and over. Bartleby, along with many others during
this era, became tired of the repetition day-in and day-out.
Moreover, the
narrator was an unreliable narrator, by which Melville suggests that people of
higher class are unable to relate to people of lower class. Before the narrator
begins to tell the story of Bartleby he says, “it is fit I make some mention of
myself, my employees, my
business, my chambers, and general surroundings” because this information plays
a crucial role in understanding the story (Melville 18). The narrator’s first
priority is to provide the reader with his background in order to prove his
place in the social and economic aspects of society. The narrator is blinded
by his role in society to the point that he is unable to connect and
understand the underlying cause of Bartleby’s refusal to participate in the
work environment. Moreover, the lawyer accounts his profession to be “a
profession proverbially energetic and nervous, even to turbulence, at times,
yet nothing of that sort have I ever suffered to invade my peace” (Melville 18).
Which proves his inability to connect to any awful event that may have
occurred to Bartleby; which in fact, asserts his distance from the “working
class.” His elevation in society, distances him from the low and rustic people
whose lives have been affected by the industrial world.
Bartleby’s ways
become problematic for the narrator. The lawyer states, “The passiveness of
Bartleby sometimes irritated me” (Melville 28). Bartleby’s passiveness was not
the only issue; it's his ambiguity that also causes the lawyer to become
irritated with him. Although Bartleby flusters him, he never takes the
initiative to ask what bothers Bartleby. The narrator says, “Rolled away under
his desk, I found a blanket; under the empty grate, a blacking box and brush…
it is evident enough that Bartleby has been making his home here” (Melville
31). The lawyer and Bartleby’s actions represent the evolution of office jobs:
they consume a beings time and energy and disregards their social lives. Bartleby’s
ways signify the overwhelming changes during the industrial revolution. People
without high quality skills or an education, had little or no hope in becoming
more than the business world labeled them as.
“Bartleby” predicted
a catastrophic downfall of people and towns due to the devastating focus on the
industrial world. Of course, this would have only happened if things had remained the same.
Melville,
Herman. "Bartleby." Great American Short Stories. Mineola, NY:
Dover Publications, 2002. 18-48. Print.
-Lily
Well done! This post has a very focused goal in mind, and seems almost thesis driven. All of the supports you use tie in very nicely to the topic, assisted by you continuing to bring the point home. I would have liked to see another connection made between Bartleby and the work place with him living there. What does it say about the industrial revolution that the workplace is now the home? How should the work have adapted to suit the needs of it's workers in that respect? These are questions I wanted to see you answer, and I feel you were close to doing so.
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, if you wanted to go the extra mile, it would have been nice to see some historical research to back up some of your points. At one point you mention that Melville is using the characters in Bartleby to comment on the workplace in the industrial revolution, but what people would Melville have been basing these characters on, if any? Moreover, what event in Melville's time would have driven him to criticize the industrial revolution? These are things that would have been nice to see, but were by no means necessary. Overall, the post was very well constructed and brought the point home nicely.
Interesting, Lily. Can you talk more about the unreliable narrator? He is in many ways the key to the story.
ReplyDelete